Canadian Journal of Bioethics / Revue canadienne de bioéthique https://cjb-rcb.ca/index.php/cjb-rcb <p>The <em>Canadian Journal of Bioethics</em> is a peer-reviewed, bilingual (French and English), international, open access academic journal that publishes theoretical, conceptual and empirical research in bioethics. The aim of the journal is to provide a space for the publication of high quality and thought provoking bioethics scholarship of diverse forms (e.g., articles, commentaries, book reviews, editorials, debate pieces, case studies) and from across the full range of specialties in the field (e.g., clinical ethics, research ethics, public health ethics, technology ethics, professional ethics). The journal welcomes submissions that might not otherwise be publishable in US or European bioethics journals because of the language (e.g., in French), jurisdictional context (e.g., specific national issues or cases), form or subject matter (e.g., using diverse theoretical frameworks or applying novel methods).</p> Programmes de bioéthique, École de santé publique de l'Université de Montréal en-US Canadian Journal of Bioethics / Revue canadienne de bioéthique 2561-4665 <p>The&nbsp;<em>Canadian Journal of Bioethics</em>&nbsp;applies the&nbsp;<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</a>&nbsp;to all its publications. Authors therefore retain copyright of their publication, e.g., they can reuse their publication, link to it on their home page or institutional website, deposit a PDF in a public repository. However, the authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy their publication, so long as the original authors and source are cited.</p> The Power of Silence https://cjb-rcb.ca/index.php/cjb-rcb/article/view/701 <p>In conversation with Hortense Gallois’ recent essay on the importance of bioethicists participating in public discourse, I suggest that speaking up is as fraught as it is important. Focusing on the anti-trans movement’s misuse of expertise, I highlight the fine line between correcting misinformation and inadvertently causing harm through ill-timed speech. Drawing on the work of Eva Feder Kittay, I suggest that knowing when to speak up and when to stay silent starts with understanding the communities we speak about and the consequences that our words can have on them.</p> Florence Ashley Copyright (c) 2023 Florence Ashley https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2024-03-18 2024-03-18 7 1 56 57 10.7202/1110334ar Towards an Alliance Between Biologists and Ethicists: Paving the Way for Tomorrow https://cjb-rcb.ca/index.php/cjb-rcb/article/view/662 <p style="font-weight: 400;">The COVID-19 pandemic, climate migration, and biodiversity loss are examples of contemporary crises which, as Van Rensselaer Potter suggests, would benefit from a rapprochement between <em>Bio</em> and <em>Ethics</em> in order to mitigate the damage. Future bioethicists will have to continue this Potterian quest by opening up the field of bioethics to new interdisciplinary collaboration and themes of study, going beyond biomedical technologies and the life sciences, to include business, corporations, finance, the market and human consumption, production and demography, all of which have significant influences on the local allocation of care and on the global future of ecosystems.</p> Antoine Boudreau LeBlanc Copyright (c) 2024 Antoine Boudreau LeBlanc https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2024-03-18 2024-03-18 7 1 19 22 10.7202/1110323ar Disabling Bioethics Futures https://cjb-rcb.ca/index.php/cjb-rcb/article/view/703 <p>Relationships between disability and bioethics are often fraught, particularly when we are concerned with imagining possible futures. The futures imagined for disabled people are often futures without disabled people, utopias where disability has been cured, defeated, or overcome. How might we build better disability futures in a discipline so often committed to futures without disability? Here, I call for more creative inquiries into disability through research, representation, education, and engagement with disabled expertise.</p> C Dalrymple-Fraser Copyright (c) 2024 C Dalrymple-Fraser https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2024-03-18 2024-03-18 7 1 12 15 10.7202/1110321ar Professionalization of Clinical Bioethics: This is the Way https://cjb-rcb.ca/index.php/cjb-rcb/article/view/665 <p>Professionalization across the field of bioethics is valuable and should be invested in by future generations of ethicists. To support this, standardization should expand beyond clinical ethics, ensuring considerations for organizational and research ethics, and encouraging membership that includes those with diverse backgrounds of education, lived experiences, and employment.</p> Daniel Wyzynski Copyright (c) 2024 Daniel Wyzynski https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2024-03-18 2024-03-18 7 1 58 60 10.7202/1110335ar A Letter to the Current and Future Generation of Bioethicists: Learn to Navigate Between Theory and Practice https://cjb-rcb.ca/index.php/cjb-rcb/article/view/699 <p>This letter is an unpretentious reflection on a decade of research in applied ethics and bioethics. Drawing on the experiential knowledge of the author, who has a background in occupational therapy and philosophy, this letter presents some of what has been learned over the years, which may help the current and future generation of bioethicists to navigate between theory and practice, and in so doing, value those confronted with ethical issues, demonstrate epistemic humility, while mobilizing ideas and theories capable of shedding light on the ethical dimensions of various experiences and practices.</p> Marie-Josée Drolet Copyright (c) 2024 Marie-Josée Drolet https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2024-03-18 2024-03-18 7 1 36 38 10.7202/1110328ar