Archaeologists, Indigenous Peoples and Managers: What Reconciliation is Possible When Ethics and Perspectives Differ?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7202/1073791ar

Keywords:

archaeology, Indigenous Peoples, ethics, collaborative approach, tension, legitimacy

Language(s):

French

Abstract

The decolonization of science and reconciliation with Indigenous Peoples are leading archaeologists to adopt a new praxis that is more collaborative and more respectful of Indigenous issues, considerations and perspectives. Despite the generally positive consequences emanating from this type of project, tensions can arise between the stakeholders when their needs and objectives do not concur. The fictive case study presented here illustrates the complexity of such situations and the ethical dilemmas that can arise from them.

Open issue, (c) Han Han Li

Downloads

Published

2020-11-16

How to Cite

[1]
Gates St-Pierre C. Archaeologists, Indigenous Peoples and Managers: What Reconciliation is Possible When Ethics and Perspectives Differ?. Can. J. Bioeth 2020;3:137-40. https://doi.org/10.7202/1073791ar.

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 3 (2020): Open Issue

Section

Case studies

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Christian Gates St-Pierre

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The Canadian Journal of Bioethics applies the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License to all its publications. Authors therefore retain copyright of their publication, e.g., they can reuse their publication, link to it on their home page or institutional website, deposit a PDF in a public repository. However, the authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy their publication, so long as the original authors and source are cited.