Late-term Abortion and Medical Aid in Dying beyond Individual Autonomy: How to Regulate Practices to Facilitate Living Together?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7202/1089781arKeywords:
Late abortion, medical aid in dying, individual autonomy, relational autonomy, intersubjectivity, internormativity, clinical governanceLanguage(s):
FrenchAbstract
It seems that the implementation of the rights recognised by legislators and courts in the context of late-term abortion and medical aid in dying are, in practice, problematic. Indeed, we are currently in an era where the law places great importance on individual autonomy in the medical field, but where practices and other normativities considerably limit this autonomy. It is therefore appropriate to take a critical look at the concept of autonomy in the context of late-term abortion and medical aid in dying. These observations raise questions about the role and limits of state law when transposed into a clinical context, as well as about the lack of attention paid by the law to the recipients of the norm. The challenge is to ensure that the different norms and values coexist so that the decision-making mechanisms reflect a genuine concern for living together.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Louise Bernier, Stéphane Bernatchez, Alexandra Sweeney Beaudry
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Canadian Journal of Bioethics applies the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License to all its publications. Authors therefore retain copyright of their publication, e.g., they can reuse their publication, link to it on their home page or institutional website, deposit a PDF in a public repository. However, the authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy their publication, so long as the original authors and source are cited.