Protecting Peer Support Values and Ethics Through Community-Engaged Bioethics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7202/1122844arKeywords:
community-engaged bioethics, co-optation, peer support drift, professionalization, psychiatric survivor movementLanguage(s):
EnglishAbstract
There has been a long history of cross-pollination between peer support (PS) in the United States and Canada, but collaboration has declined over the past two decades as PS has become increasingly professionalized. With government recognition and funding, PS has moved from informal friendships in the community among those with similar lived experiences towards paid PS employment in clinical services. In this commentary we argue that PS in Canada and the US should return to working together. We share ethical challenges related to the professionalization — and associated co-optation and drift — of PS, where PS deviates from its unique grounding in authentic human connection, social movement organizing, and core values of self-determination, shared power, hope, and mutuality. The resulting loss of the transformative power of PS is particularly potent in our current moment when it has so much to offer. We describe how our team of community-engaged bioethicists from Canada and the US and leaders of the PS discipline in Canada are collaborating to elaborate, legitimize, and protect the unique values and ethics of this expanding and evolving modality of care.
References
1. PeerWorks. Frequently asked questions. PeerWorks; 2024.
2. Myrick K, del Vecchio P. Peer support services in the behavioral healthcare workforce: State of the field. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2016;39(3):197-203.
3. Cyr C, McKee H, O’Hagan M, Priest R. Making the Case for Peer Support. Report to the Mental Health Commission of Canada Mental Health Peer Support Project Committee. Sept 2010.
4. Starkman M. The movement. Phoenix Rising: The Voice of the Psychiatrized. 1981;2(3):2A-9A.
5. Crossley N. Contesting Psychiatry: Social Movements in Mental Health. London: Routledge; 2006.
6. Frazer-Carroll M. Mad World: The Politics of Mental Health. London: Pluto Press; 2023.
7. Goffman E. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall; 1963.
8. Goffman E. Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1970.
9. Chesler P. Women & madness. New York: Avon; 1972.
10. Szasz T. The Myth of Mental Illness: Foundations of a Theory of Personal Conduct. New York: Hoeber-Harper; 1961.
11. Szasz T. The Manufacture of Madness: A Comparative Study of the Inquisition and the Mental Health Movement. Harper & Row; 1970.
12. Szasz T. The Myth of Psychotherapy: Mental Healing as Religion, Rhetoric, and Repression. New York: Oxford University Press; 1978.
13. Everett B. A Fragile Revolution: Consumers and Psychiatric Survivors Confront the Power of the Mental Health System. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press; 2000.
14. Shimrat I. Call Me Crazy: Stories from the Mad Movement. Vancouver: Press Gang Publishers; 1997.
15. Weitz D. Phoenix Rising: Its birth and death. Border/Lines. 1990;(19):14-17.
16. Anthony WA. Recovery from mental illness: the guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosoc Rehabil J. 1993;16(4):11-23.
17. Deegan PE. Recovery: The lived experience of rehabilitation. Psychosoc Rehabil J. 1988;11(4):11-19.
18. Poole JM. Behind the Rhetoric: Mental Health Recovery in Ontario. New York: Columbia University Press; 2011.
19. Chamberlin J. On Our Own: Patient-Controlled Alternatives to the Mental Health System. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
20. Finkler L. Psychiatric Survivor Pride Day: Community organizing with psychiatric survivors. Osgoode Hall Law J. 1997;35(3):763-72.
21. Reaume G. A history of Psychiatric Survivor Pride Day during the 1990s. Consumer/Survivor Information Resource Centre Bulletin. 2008;(374):2-3.
22. Mad in America Continuing Education. Mad studies: An introduction to philosophical, social, and cultural perspectives on madness. 2025.
23. Reaume G. Creating Mad People’s History as a university credit course since 2000. New Horizons Adult Educ Hum Resour Dev. 2019;31(1):22-39.
24. Stratford AC, Halpin M, Phillips K, et al. The growth of peer support: An international charter. J Ment Health. 2019;28(6):627-32.
25. Penney D, Prescott L. The co-optation of survivor knowledge: The danger of substituted values and voice. In: Russo J, Sweeney A, editors. Searching For a Rose Garden: Challenging Psychiatry, Fostering Mad Studies. Herefordshire: PCCS Books; 2016. p. 35-45.
26. Alberta AJ, Ploski RR. Cooptation of peer support staff: Quantitative evidence. Rehabil Process Outcome. 2014;3.
27. Britz B, Jones N. Experiencing and treating ‘madness’ in the United States circa 1967—2022: Critical counter-histories. SSM Ment Health. 2023;4:100228.
28. Shalaby RAH, Agyapong VI. Peer support in mental health: literature review. JMIR Ment Health. 2020;7(6):e15572.
29. Davidow S. The downfall of peer support: MHA & national certification. Mad in America: Science, Psychiatry and Social Justice. 18 Apr 2017.
30. Brown C, Stastny P. Peer workers in the mental health system: A transformative or collusive experiment? In: Russo J, Sweeney A, editors. Searching For a Rose Garden: Challenging Psychiatry, Fostering Mad Studies. Herefordshire: PCCS Books; 2016. p. 183-91.
31. Emerick RE. The politics of psychiatric self-help: Political factions, interactional support, and group longevity in a social movement. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(10):1121-28.
32. Fisher DB. A new vision of healing as constructed by people with psychiatric disabilities working as mental health providers. Psychosoc Rehabil J. 1994;17(3):67-81.
33. McLean AH. From ex-patient alternatives to consumer options: Consequences of consumerism for psychiatric consumers and the ex-patient movement. Int J Health Serv. 2000;30(4):821-47.
34. National Association of Peer Supporters. National Practice Guidelines for Peer Specialists and Supervisors. Washington, DC: NAPS; 2019.
35. O’Hagan M. Stopovers on my way home from Mars: A journey into the psychiatric survivor movement in the USA, Britain and the Netherlands. 1993.
36. White WL. A lost vision: Addiction counseling as community organization. Alcohol Treat Q. 2001;19(4):1-32.
37. White WL. The road not taken: The lost roots of addiction counseling. Counselor. 2003;4(2):22-23.
38. Phillips KM. Supervision of peer support workers. In: O’Donoghue K, Engelbrecht L, editors. The Routledge International Handbook of Social Work Supervision. London: Routledge; 2021. p. 187-99.
39. Rebeiro Gruhl K, Lacarte S, Boucher M. Mainstream integration of mental health peer support in Canada: A mixed method study. Can J Community Ment Health. 2023;42(1):75-95.
40. Claxton-Wali T. Avoiding peer support drift: Maintaining your role as a change agent. Ontario Peer Development Initiative annual conference. 2017.
41. Ellison ML, Mueller L, Henze K, et al. The Veteran Supported Education Service Treatment Manual VetSEd. ENRM Veterans Hospital. Center for Health Quality, Outcomes, and Economic Research; 2012.
42. Crepaz-Keay D, Cyhlarova E. Ethical issues in mental health peer support. In: Sadler JZ, Fulford KWM, van Staden W, editors. The Oxford Handbook of Psychiatric Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015. p. 244-54.
43. Foye U, Lyons N, Shah P, et al. Understanding the barriers and facilitators to delivering peer support effectively in England: A qualitative interview study. BMC Psychiatry. 2025;25:480.
44. Government of Western Australia Mental Health Commission. The Role of Peer Work. 2023.
45. Sinclair A, Gillieatt S, Fernandes C, Mahboub L. Inclusion as assimilation, integration, or co-optation? A post-structural analysis of inclusion as produced through mental health research on peer support. Qual Health Res. 2023;33(6):543-55.
46. von Peter S, Kuesel M, Ziegenhagen J, Fehler G, Schmidt D, Ruiz-Perez G. “Change Agents” oder “Peer Washing”: inwiefern können Peer-und Genesungsbegleiter* innen zur Veränderung von psychiatrischen Einrichtungen beitragen? Psychiatr Prax. 2024;51(08):410-17.
47. World Health Organization. One-to-one peer support by and for people with lived experience. WHO QualityRights guidance module. 2019.
48. de Bie L, Michetti-Wilson E. Drift from Peer Support Values and Standards: A Position Statement and Call for Action. PeerWorks; 2024.
49. Adams WE, Duquette R, de Wet A, Rogers ES. Competing allegiance in an unclear role: Peer and non-peer understanding of peer support in Massachusetts, United States. SSM Ment Health. 2023;4:100245.
50. Maviglia M, Charzuk A, Hume D. Does official recognition of peers undermine their work? Mad in America: Science, Psychiatry and Social Justice. 29 May 2021.
51. Homewood Health Centre. The mental health toll of trade tariffs: Understanding the hidden impact.
52. Mental Health Research Canada. The Impact of Economic and Political Strain on Canadians’ Mental Health: Omnibus Survey. 27 Mar 2025.
53. Mental Health Commission of Canada. Changing Directions, Changing Lives: The Mental Health Strategy for Canada. Calgary, AB; 2012.
54. PeerWorks. Strategic Plan 2025-2035. 2025.
55. Fortuna KL, Marceau SR, Kadakia A, et al. Peer support specialists’ perspectives of a standard online research ethics training: Qualitative study. JMIR Form Res. 2022;6(2):e29073.
56. Knopes J. Chat windows and zoom bombers: Virtual boundaries in mental health peer support. Disabil Soc. 2025;40(4):979-97.
57. Knopes J, D’égale-Flanagan M. Dual relationships in mental health peer support. Psychiatr Serv. 2023;74(12):1296-98.
58. Morley G, Sankary LR. Nurturing moral community: A novel moral distress peer support navigator tool. Nurs Ethics. 2024;31(5):980-91.
59. Regel E. Mental health and humanitarian crisis: Moral stress in trauma therapy. Bioethics. 2024;38(9):811-15.
60. Knopes J, Guidry-Grimes L. Reframing mental health ethics. Community Ment Health J. 2024;60(2):208-14.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lee de Bie, Julia Knopes, Allison Dunning, Allyson Theodorou , Brookelyn Fortier
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Canadian Journal of Bioethics applies the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License to all its publications. Authors therefore retain copyright of their publication, e.g., they can reuse their publication, link to it on their home page or institutional website, deposit a PDF in a public repository. However, the authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, distribute, and/or copy their publication, so long as the original authors and source are cited.
_smaller.png){kind=logo}
