Use of Secondary Data and Scientific Authorship during the Evaluation of a Global Health Intervention

Authors

  • Valéry Ridde Centre Population et Développement (CEPED), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Université Paris Descartes, INSERM, équipe SAGESUD, Paris, France; Institut de recherche en santé publique de l'Université de Montréal (IRSPUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7202/1058278ar

Keywords:

global health, evaluative research, secondary data, ethical issues, scientific authorship

Language(s):

French

Abstract

In the area of global health, international donors fund many interventions that they want to be effective. They sometimes fund external evaluations, most often conducted by northern researchers, to demonstrate effectiveness. In addition, there are multiple databases, often collected by researchers from the South, useful for this type of study. But the multiplicity of actors, collaborations, issues and potential conflicts of interest pose significant challenges in terms of the use of secondary data and the scientific authorship of publications that may result. This case study offers some thought in this regard.

Published

2018-03-08

How to Cite

[1]
Ridde V. Use of Secondary Data and Scientific Authorship during the Evaluation of a Global Health Intervention. Can. J. Bioeth 2018;1:39-40. https://doi.org/10.7202/1058278ar.

Issue

Section

Case studies