A Life Disrupted: Perspectives on Track 2 MAID from Persons Living with Chronic Illness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7202/1121330arKeywords:
medical assistance in dying, MAID, euthanasia, qualitative research, chronic illness, disability, life experienceLanguage(s):
EnglishAbstract
Background: In 2021, Canada extended Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) to persons whose natural death is not reasonably foreseeable, referred to as Track 2 MAID. The purpose of this study was to develop a better understanding of best practices for Track 2 MAID from the perspectives of those living with an illness, disease, or disability that could potentially make them eligible for MAID. Methods: This was a qualitative interview study using the principles of Interpretive Description. Seven participants were interviewed three times over a period of 3-6 weeks. Findings: Participants described prolonged and complex illness trajectories that resulted in suffering from loss, stigma, and iatrogenic harm. The expertise they had developed over years of living with their condition and the challenges they had experienced in healthcare informed their perspectives about MAID care. Participants highlighted essential expertise needed for Track 2 assessors to provide compassionate, trauma-informed care. Participants recognized the need for time to achieve a holistic understanding of each applicant’s experience, consequent suffering, attempts to relieve that suffering, and to develop a picture of decline over time. Participants were troubled by perceived tension between autonomy and the role of the social determinants of health in determinations of eligibility for MAID. Discussion: Overall, participants described the necessity of a partnered approach to Track 2 MAID assessment. Although participants considered the individual autonomy of others as more important than their personal views, they expressed grave concerns about the potential for inadequate health and social care systems to influence requests for MAID.
References
1. Nicol J, Tiedeman M. Legislative summary of Bill C-7: An act to amend the criminal code (medical assistance in dying). No. 43-1-C7-E. Ottawa: Government of Canada; 2021.
2. Nicol J. Medical assistance in dying: the law in selected jurisdictions outside Canada. No. 2015-116-E. Ottawa: Government of Canada; 2021.
3. Health Canada. Fifth Annual Report on Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada 2023. Ottawa; 2024.
4. Wiebe E, Kelly M. Medical assistance in dying when natural death is not reasonably foreseeable: Survey of providers’ experiences with patients making track 2 requests. Canadian Family Physician. 2023;69(12):853-58.
5. Pesut B, Thorne S, Chambaere K, Hall M, Schiller CJ. The evolving complexities of MAID care in Canada from a nursing perspective. Global Qualitative Nursing Research. 2024;11:23333936241228233.
6. Fruhstorfer C, Kelly M, Spiegel L, Baylis PJ, Dembo J, Wiebe E. Patient experiences with requests for medical assistance in dying: perspectives of those with complex chronic conditions. Canadian Family Physician. 2024;70(1):41-7.
7. Thorne S. Interpretive Description: Qualitative Research for Applied Practice. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2016.
8. Blease C, Carel H, Geraghty K. Epistemic injustice in healthcare encounters: evidence from chronic fatigue syndrome. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2017;43(8):549-57.
9. Hintz EA. “It’s All in Your Head”: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research about disenfranchising talk experienced by female patients with chronic overlapping pain conditions. Health Communication. 2023;38(11):2501-15.
10. Health Canada. Model practice standard for Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID). Ottawa; 2023.
11. Wiebe K, Mullin A. Choosing death in unjust conditions: hope, autonomy and harm reduction. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2024;50(6):407-12.
12. Christie T, Li M. Medically assisted dying in Canada and unjust social conditions: a response to Wiebe and Mullin. Journal of Med Ethics. 2024;50(6):423-4.
13. Lazin SJ, Chandler JA. Two views of vulnerability in the evolution of Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying law. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 2023;32(1):105-17.
14. Canadian Association of MAID Assessors and Providers. Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) assessments for people with complex chronic conditions. Feb 2023.
15. McMorrow T, Wiebe E, Liyanage R, Tremblay-Huet S, Kellet M. Interpreting eligibility under the Medical assistance in Dying law: The experiences of physicians and nurse practitioners. McGill Journal of Law and Health. 2020;14(1):51-108.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Barbara Pesut, Sally Thorne, Caroline Variath, Margaret Hall, Catharine Schiller, Helen Sharp, Glendon Wiebe, W. David Robertson, Michael McKenzie, Laurel Plewes

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Canadian Journal of Bioethics applies the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License to all its publications. Authors therefore retain copyright of their publication, e.g., they can reuse their publication, link to it on their home page or institutional website, deposit a PDF in a public repository. However, the authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, distribute, and/or copy their publication, so long as the original authors and source are cited.














_smaller.png)
