The Morning: Constructing Moral Space from the African American Experience in Bioethics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7202/1122841arKeywords:
African Americans, courage, interconnectedness, morals, neutrality, social marginalization, social supportLanguage(s):
EnglishAbstract
Bioethicists, globally, have historically enjoyed collaborative exchange and relationships. However, given the current political strain, moral deliberation is threatened and diminished. The redevelopment of morally safe spaces and the pursuit of truth require the embodiment of moral courage and intentionality. To meet the moment, bioethics must move beyond neutrality by drawing on the African American experience’s emphasis on moral clarity and community accountability — embracing positionality and centring marginalized voices to confront socio-political tensions within and beyond academia. The concepts of the 3Ms (moaning, mourning, and morning) provide a framework for creating a more inclusive moral space. Based in social work theoretical praxis, Moaning refers to African American pain and suffering, Mourning, the collective effort to overcome grief, and Morning, the representation of breakthrough and transformation from hardships. Despite the three concepts being a powerful exploration of the African American tradition, it can be helpful to others outside this community. This essay focuses, however, only on the concept of “Morning” — a metaphor that serves as a blueprint for the bioethics profession to address the current political climate. It is imperative that bioethics elevate the voices and listen to the past experiences of the marginalized and oppressed. These experiences can provide a blueprint for transcending barriers of social and political inequities, both domestically and abroad. We suggest reevaluating the use of neutrality, opting instead for clear commitments to positions on ethical dilemmas.
References
1. Ashby MA, Morrell B. To the barricades or the blackboard: bioethical activism and the “stance of neutrality.” Journal of Bioethical Inquiry. 2018;15(4):479-82.
2. Pacia DM, Baban SS, Fletcher FE, et al. A survey of attitudes toward social justice obligations in the field of bioethics. AJOB Empirical Bioethics. 2025; 16(3):151-62.
3. Freedman B. Where are the heroes of bioethics? Journal of Clinical Ethics. 1996;7(4):297-99.
4. Martin EP, Martin JM. Social Work and the Black Experience. Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers Press; 1995.
5. Levine C. Analyzing Pandora’s box. In: Eckenwiler LA, Cohn F, editors. The Ethics of Bioethics: Mapping the Moral Landscape. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2007. p. 3-23.
6. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About the untreated syphilis study at Tuskegee. Atlanta. 4 Sept 2024.
7. Vedantam S, Penman M, Schmidt J, Boyle T, Cohen R, Connelly C. Remembering Anarcha, Lucy, and Betsey: the mothers of modern gynecology. NPR. 7 Feb 2017.
8. Fletcher FE, Ray KS, Brown VA, Smith PT. Addressing anti‐black racism in bioethics: responding to the call. Hastings Center Report. 2022;52(S1):S3-11.
9. Sinha, M. The Slave’s Cause: A History of Abolition. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2016.
10. The Library of Congress. The Civil Rights Act of 1964: A long struggle for freedom epilogue. 10 Oct 2014.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Donald Carter, III, Kara Simpson, Alvin L. Reaves

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Canadian Journal of Bioethics applies the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License to all its publications. Authors therefore retain copyright of their publication, e.g., they can reuse their publication, link to it on their home page or institutional website, deposit a PDF in a public repository. However, the authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, distribute, and/or copy their publication, so long as the original authors and source are cited.














_smaller.png)
