Investigational Therapies and Patients’ Autonomy

Authors

  • Trisevgeni Papakonstantinou Department of Psychology and Language Sciences, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5116-1531
  • Theofilos Kolettis Department of Cardiology, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6680-9131

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7202/1073786ar

Keywords:

investigational agents, autonomy, Kantian ethics, patient

Language(s):

English

Abstract

The growing demand for novel therapies has raised new ethical dilemmas for society. Vigorous debates have been initiated, especially after the recent Right to Try Act in the US, which aims to facilitate access to new agents, even at an early stage of the investigation process. This article explores the concept of patient’s autonomy in accessing investigational treatments, and discusses the implications of autonomy for patients, researchers and regulatory authorities. We propose that, in cases of adequate understanding of the anticipated risks and benefits, society should accept patients’ autonomy in choosing to try new therapies, even in the absence of firm data. However, basic ethical principles should not be compromised, as the medical community and society as a whole retain the right to properly evaluate the accumulated experience from such cases. These thoughts may contribute to the ongoing discussions on ethical policies in clinical research.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-16

How to Cite

[1]
Papakonstantinou T, Kolettis T. Investigational Therapies and Patients’ Autonomy. Can. J. Bioeth 2020;3:115-7. https://doi.org/10.7202/1073786ar.

Issue

Section

Critical commentaries