The Risk of Paternalism in the Use of Narrative Ethics: The Case of Voluntary Sterilization in Childless Women Under 30
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7202/1117876arKeywords:
bioethics, narrative ethics, epistemic injustice, medical paternalism, sterilizationLanguage(s):
FrenchAbstract
This text is a commentary on Masella and Marceau’s article on voluntary sterilization in childless women under 30. I argue that their publication is essential for a rigorous analysis of the ethical dilemma between women’s autonomy and medical paternalism. However, I also suggest that their proposal of a narrative ethics approach as a solution to the ethical dilemma opens the way to a more insidious, but no less problematic, paternalism. That is, a narrative ethics can, paradoxically, reactivate paternalistic dynamics and amplify epistemic and social injustices.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Arthur Filleul
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Canadian Journal of Bioethics applies the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License to all its publications. Authors therefore retain copyright of their publication, e.g., they can reuse their publication, link to it on their home page or institutional website, deposit a PDF in a public repository. However, the authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy their publication, so long as the original authors and source are cited.
_smaller.png){kind=logo}
